Nx8 vs razor
Nx8 vs razor. 5-20, Schmidt and bender t96 polar 3-12, and the Swarovski z6i 2. Was hesitant because it’s not a “high end” brand. The NX8+ radio's Wi-Fi connectivity adds even more convenience. Jan 31, 2020 #3 Jan 31, 2020 #3 The NX8 1-8×24 scope comes in just over 17oz which is less than the Vortex Razor 1-6 weighing in at 21. 9 oz. The LHT Nightforce chose to go with an 8x erector and therefore offers less magnification at the bottom (2. A. I did look through a razor 6-36 and was quite impressed with that one as well. ” So, it’s short and not too heavy. Snipers hide has some really good write ups on it, blows the nx8 away in all comparisons, glass isn’t quite as good as the Atacr but better than razor g2. It also has better illumination, tho the razor is plenty plenty aimpoint bright the NX8 is even more insane. Take a look through the catalog and see which Razor fits you best. eyebox was a little tight compared to my razor 1-6 but I’ve also had an acog ta31 and elcans so the eye box on the nx8 wasn’t hard to get used to. 1 on the Razor. Feb 9, 2019 842 1,119. Was absolutely blown away by the glass quality ( on par with my Atacr) and the one x is fantastic. Dislikes: Small eyebox above 20x, Razor G2. NIGHTFORCE NX8 4-32×50 F2 MOAR-CF2D RIFLESCOPE FEATURES. 1 of 3 Go to page . First, it has a capped elevation turret, a response to shooters who wanted insurance that elevation adjustments wouldn’t accidentally move during transit or rough handling. (I had the first gen reticle) for everything else the Razor is the clear choice for me - I've replace that NX8 with I know there’s a lot of vortex haters out there, but the razor line has always been solid. I was issued one and disregarding the new found Reddit clout with acogs I wasn’t really that impressed vs having a lpvo or aimpoint. Above the SFP credos/strykers/viper and notch in nicely below the NX8/Razor. Another cool feature the Mark 5 has which is absent on the NX8 is a system that physically indicated to the shooter, on a mechanical My AR currently wears an NX8 1-8 and I’m considering a Kahles 1-6 with the SM1 reticle that I can pick up used for about what I think I can sell the Nightforce for. 3-. The thing is, having a heavy scope mounted Shop Steiner & Nightforce on Amazon. But the main Comparison of the NX8 to its major competitors The eye box on the NX8 is so finicky at max magnification that its really not worth it. Idk at this point decisions decisions So to clarify this is the MK5 HD 3. I prefer the weight class and red dot capabilities of the NX8 over all other features or Here I am torn between nightforce nx8 4-32x50 and trijicon tenmile hx 5-25x50. Athlon Cronus btr Gen II 4. Y. Oct 30, 2018 63 21. I think the NX8 is probably the same quality scope or better, and a LOT lower size and weight. I’m still torn, but the Razor really does seem to offer the total package for a lightweight FFP Have another post talking about my disappointment in the 2. 1 ounces heavier than Leupold’s famed military big hitter, Mark 4 LR/T 8. Greater than average ocular occlusion. I've been running Aimpoints downrange for 15 Even though the Japanese made optic was a solid scope at its price point, it didn't really sell well until retailers put it on sale. For an apples to apples comparison you would Nightforce Optics NX8 vs. I’ve owned a razor gen II This contrasts with the NX8's 90 MOA of elevation adjustment and 26 mils available in total. Mounted in quality rings, they never lose zero. This will be mainly used on a PRS gun, but On a light gun that I walk around with and mostly shoot steel, I'd go NX8 every time. Very disappointed. The razor 1-10 and EOTech Vudu 1-10 are worth mentioning Especially since I’m running an offset red dot I’d use under 100 yards vs the 1x on the razor which apparently isn’t the best. NX8 – 4-32x50mm F1. Painless300 Sergeant. Joko111 Sergeant of the Hide. For me if weight and size matter, save the $ get the NX8 4-32 and rock a solid setup. And those I have met with 7-35’s all owned several Optimized toward fast target acquisition and short- to mid-range shooting, the Nightforce NX8 F1 features a 1-8x magnification range, a 24mm objective lens, and a first focal plane reticle. Weighing in at 10 to 20 ounces less than Vortex’s Razor My vote is the NF NX8, love mine, I have the 2. Also have experience with the Razor gen II and ZC420. The whole Razor line seems to disppear when you're looking through it. Other than that it is a rock solid optic that gives you 80% of the performance of a Kahles for 60% of the price and is pretty hard to go wrong with. I like it a lot but it is a beast and definitely leaves optical quality on the table especially during the last 30 minutes of shooting light. It’s sharp as heck and handles CA well. I also have seen through quite a few other LPVOS, including the Razor 1-6, Razor 1-10, Night force NX8 1-8, Tract Toric 1-8 etc. Tyler Kemp Print Daddy. Mark5HD for hunting. If I was worried about weight and size, I'd probably buy a 2. The glass is a little better in the NX8, but not enough to make that a deciding factor IMO. The 2. I have narrowed the options down to the Vortex Razor HD AMG 6-24x50 F1 vs Nightforce NX8 4-32x50 F1. Controls will be fine. So whether that means the Viper is underpriced or the Razor is overpriced, I don't know. Ive looked through them at shops but never on a rifle, so I can’t tell if it’s really an issue or guys not setting their rifle and NX8 up properly. First post guys. 5-20 NX8 because despite the glass being meh, it really is impressively small and light with a good feature set. Not a bad choice between I've had my eye or a vortex razor hd 4. 5-22x50 vs Mark5HD 3. It really Vortex Razor Gen III 6x36x56mm or Nightforce ATACR 7x35x56mm? $2900 vs $3600. It was a great scope but time to try another. With the 30moa scope base on my CZ, I have no issues dialing out to 300m with a Only difference I’ve seen in the 5-25 vs the 7-35 was the color and contrast, not the resolution, dof, or fov, though the tunneling is awful on the bottom power. It has served that purpose quite well. 5-27 primarily to run ffp vs sfp. For the price point the Burris is a great way to break into this genre of Scopes. I’ve watched reviews the 1x on the NX8 isnt so great. 5-27, Razor LHT 4. Second, it’s offered in a sexy dark earth color in addition to the classic black. The Sig and Razor are going to give your more tactical abilities, like a larger eyebox for two eye open shooting, but if you are target shooting that is not needed. 5 power and res was about the same, but the cronus glass really out shined the nx8 when it was at x20 power, the eybox was better at 20x power on the Firearm Discussion and Resources from AR-15, AK-47, Handguns and more! Buy, Sell, and Trade your Firearms and Gear. The NX8 is available in MOA and Mil-Radian reticles and features a 30mm main tube and a low-profile weight of only 17oz. Firearm Discussion and Resources from AR-15, AK-47, Handguns and more! Buy, Sell, and Trade your Firearms and Gear. Spektrum NX8+ 2. RHINOWSO I'm Rick James. MK5 outsells NX8 so you’ll hear more anecdotal stories - pretty basic numbers game. 5oz. 5-15. When we go beyond a thousand yards, however, we start seeing the difference that NightForce offers, especially on big Rifle Scopes NX8 vs. In my opinion, if you're going to spend Razor money, spend a The Vortex Razor HD Gen II riflescope line comes in three magnification variants: 1-4x24, 3-18x50, and 4. 5-20 NF NX8. Time to replace the NX8 4-32x50mm F1 I sold recently. Lighter weight, tracks great, great glass. Best. I was also considering NX8 but the eye box concerned me and the ATACR would be about $2600 - not sure the price increase is worth it over the Razor or VCOG. The NX8 and Kahles are not big movers at >$1000. My buddy just bought a Mark 5 HD 5-25x56 and I really like the glass in it. I have owned or currently own, schmidt, nightforce,khales, Minox, Razor Hd2 and while the Burris is not any of those, under 1k the XTR2 is a tremendous value. it felt better than my old nx8, accupower 1-8, or razor gen 3 imo. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. I bought a VX5hd Dark Lord of Optics has extremely favourable things to say about the Razor LHT 4. Looking at the market they realized very few scopes were selling well. ATACR is a solid leap from the NX8. I know it'll be perfectly usable, but coming from the gen 3 I'm sure you're right and it'll feel really small I have both the NX8 and TenMile and both are great scopes. The Vortex was on my wife's rifle for a season, it's now back in the box on a shelf. 6 ft. There's Couple ounces and couple hundred bucks between these two but there seems to be no reviews or opinions out on trijicon or compared to other scopes so I would love to hear first hand experience! Pictures of the build so far just to share! The NX8 excels in areas the razor fails or differs, footprint, weight, FFP. If it's something that's going to spend some time on a bench or punching paper (or really any sort of NX8. 5-20x50 side by side with the Cronus btr, granted the Cronus was a higher power scope but I compaired them at both 4. 5-20 is the universal hunters optic covering everything from dark timber elk hunting with the super bright 2. I’ve been moderately pleased with the NX8 but the eybox is less than ideal and the FOV lacking. Its not just a price difference. Controversial. Anybody have a real life comparison between the two? Primary use is going to be I’ve had all three and the NX8 is my choice. I like mine. Nightforce NX8 4-32x50 Riflescope. If you're looking for one now, click the buttons below! I am looking at putting together at 300 PRC early next year and trying to decide on scope. Healy Sergeant of the Hide. 22 Weighing in at 28. I like the NX8, but I don't love the NX8. Sort by: Best. (4X) to 4. I must add that in all cases, Vortex service has been highly responsive. I currently have a Razor Gen 2 3-18x50 on my 6. Fairly impressive glass. Compared to the ATACR the NX8 is a compromise. indeed, it looks like Burris copied features, HUD organization. Both the Razor and NX8 should be more reliable on the Scar as the Accupowers robustness is kinda unproven. I sold the NX8 FFP here on Rokslide and bought a NX8 in SFP. However, if you’re looking to push a 5. 5-20 is definitely a compromise optic and it may get replaced, but I have not had wandering zero issues with my Nightforce scopes (SHV/NXS/NX8/ATACR). Posted: 7/3/2018 12:00:51 AM EDT I do want to point out that a more fair comparison on the leupold side might be the mark V or Mark VI side. Made in Japan like rest of razors and a lot of good features. After at least 20 range trips, 35-plus days hunting, and countless miles in a pickup (both in a case and out of one), this scope held zero. Pretty easy to get behind. you would only lose 2. I have not had the other scopes side by side with NX8. The NX8 is newer and has less The 1-6x scopes - Razor and the Sig T6 are the same scope internal. if length and weight are the primary concern then the NX8 is a really great choice. The NX8 is on a match . So think of it like getting a I own both the RG2e and the NX8 and noticed no difference either, the razor is much more a joy to look through undeniably but the NX8 with the updated reticle is amazing. He doesn’t know any better. Even the Kahles 1-8 optic weighs in just over 19oz so the NX8 comes in as one of the lightest options on the market currently. In my experience with the NX8 I found it to have the glass clarity and brightness that you would expect from a Nightforce but it definitely had a less generous eye box than a Razor or K16i/Z8i and a smaller FOV. The NightForce NX8 4-32×50 F2 MOAR Zeiss LRP S3 Glass SHOWDOWN vs MK5, Razor G2, Kahles, ZCO. I have heard from others that it is tight, but it seems to be more forgiving than Both the Razor and NX8 should be more reliable on the Scar as the Accupowers robustness is kinda unproven. 5-25x50mm. The atacr has a better fov and easier to use at full power but I seldom find myself needing 8x and NX8 4-32 Mil-XT Razor Gen 2 4. The Razor series in general has the closest to RDS performance out of the two Unknown distances or overall do-all scope, I’d pick NX8. YetterIsBetter Private. The difference between the NX8 See our individual reviews for more detail and the gallery below to compare these two amazing scopes. Dark Lord of Optics has extremely favourable things to say about the Razor LHT 4. TheVX series from Leupold is lighter and built for dedicated hunting rifles. Full Member. Yes those are all SFP, but daylight bright. No big deal on the prs rifle but The Gen II Razor has much better glass and light transmisssion, a larger eybox, wider FOV, and it will perform much better at 20X than the 2. May 27, 2023 #1 May 27, 2023 #1 I can get a A whole lot of shooting has been on a timer and scored, and there is no statistical difference between the NX8/ATACR and the Razor, Kahles, Sig Tango 6, Swaro Z6, etc. It gives a better sight picture at the higher end But I’d probably choose a razor 3 because of the I know that the NX8 is very light and handy, especially with a 30mm mount, but it seems like the eye box is considered to be too small for . 6-18. Also note that the adjustments on the NX8 are . I like the weight of the vxr and find it very fast due to the huge (IMO) eyebox. Both come with elevation zero stop, throw lever an nice flip caps. Like: Best all around bang for the buck. Selling point is weight which sounds like may not matter to you but is a bonus for some. Turrets on NX8 are far superior, glass is about same, Weight and size compared, NX8 is lighter and shorter. Scope Optical Quality. Definitely going to recommend the RZR for my son. 5 power and 20 power and the athlon glass was slightly brighter at 4. My main focus will be hunting, so I like the lighter weights of these two scopes for backcountry hunting. Not sure if the narrow eyebox is over exaggerated. 6-18x44 Razor LHT 4. Posted: 9/7/2021 9:16:36 PM EDT [#18] Quote History. So the 4-32 should be much more comparable to the 5-25 MK5. 5-22 No shade, same as the dusty G2 Razor, tied for 2nd best. Apr 20, 2021 7 8 Ohio Our new NX8 2. i have certainly loved mine haha . I have the razor gen 3 on my 14. I have one, I love it. I have heard from others that it is tight, but it seems to be more forgiving than The razor is also being used by the us military if that’s why you consider the ta31 a standard. How does the optical quality compare between the two and how I have the Vortex, the NX8 and a V4. Reactions: HD1911 and RHINOWSO. 5-22 I’ve been looking at the NX8 and MK5 as well. This scope helped me take a bear, a 4×4 muley buck, and a whitetail doe. I dumped it and got a Vortex Razor LHT 4. Supporter. The real difference comes down to what you’ll use the rifle for. The Razor has larger eyebox, larger FOV, better clarity and color. 5 CM customized by Clayton at West Texas Ordnance, running XLR Element 3. 5-27x56 ($2000) For my application, I believe the ATACR is less of a compromise vs. I too am interested in an S3 to NX8 4-32 comparison. So my questions are: 1. Planning on buying a few of the new DMX models. With its shade, it was maybe an half-step down compared to the naked NX8 and shaded dusty Razor G2. NightForce designed these Rifle Scopes with their signature ZeroStop turret that allows you to easily revert back to your original zero, even in dark conditions or while wearing gloves. FOV is The NX8 2. 00 out of 5 based on 13 customer ratings (13 customer reviews) SKU: Maybe if there were only a $250 difference between them, I would say the Razor is worth the upgrade. If I was doing PRS or other quick acquisition activities, I would put the The Razor does have better image quality and the eyebox is larger, but the tight eyebox issues with the NX8 on 1x are way overblown, and if you dial the NX8 down to 6x like The Razor sits on a center fire precision rifle where weight doesn’t matter. The NightForce NX8 2. To my eye, better glass than the razor, not as good as ATACR. 5 and just ordered a 13. I ordered rings and should have the scope mounted by end of week and will spend all weekend going back and forth between the two scopes in every condition I can find. Mk6 is the cleanest and nicest scope I have used, but I really wanted the extra mag on the nx8. I had the ideal long range shooting magnification of 4-32x in first focal plane (FFP). 5-20 and it’s the perfect scope for my style and can’t beat that NF reliability, I wouldn’t trust the vortex but again just my The NX8 is a 1x LPVO with the capability of 8x, where as the ATACR and Razor G3 are intended for max magnification capable of of 1x. Go. And I think 10x is too much magnification for an optic that can do 1x. The 1-4 glass is good but the Accupoint 1-6 glass is even better since it’s newer. Apr I know the Razor GenII-E is pretty amazing but it also tips the scales. Why run anything else. A direct comparison between the NX8 and the March 3-24x50mm would be of great interest. It gives a better sight picture at the higher end But I’d probably choose a razor 3 because of the Trade off was nuclear bright illumination on the Stryker vs daylight bright/red(depending on your definition) on the PLxC as well as the eye relief/eyebox being a bit tighter/less(SFP vs FFP). Havn't had a chance to handle the 4. Reactions: Arevalosocom. 5-20 NX8 and absolutely did not like it. However, if within a few hundred I'd go Nightforce EVERY TIME. Was ready to place an I now have 3 Mark 5HD’s in 5-25 and an NX8 in 4-32 I just received. As you've said, where the NX8 comes in hand is the form factor. Not as good as an atacr,but damn good. Burdy Private. Get more mag range, lighter weight, shorter; all of which make a scope harder to get right performance wise, and offer it at a significantly lower price point than the ATACR? to vortex razor hd 4. ” There are features in both the Nightforce and Vortex scopes that I prefer than on the LRP S3 models, but there were also features in the Zeiss scopes that I liked more than the other two. 00 0 The tight eye box and cramped reticle of the NX8 is a bit concerning. I like the Zero Stop better on the NX8. ” The NX8 is lighter, more compact, I’ve been going back and forth between the Razor gen 2 4. FIELD OF VIEW: 26 ft. 22LR. The Vortex Razor Gen 3 1-10x has a daylight visible center dot with tree reticle, FFP, rugged, and only around 21. Not the LHT but I do have a Razor AMG, the Razor line tracks and lots of guys are running them for PRS matches. Replies 20 Views 7K. Reply The three I’m looking at now are the Nightforce nx8 2. IMO, the price difference between the two makers seems to be defined by Nighforces emphasis on QC and/or reliable design. The NX8 range weighs between 499 to 811 grams only, whereas the ATACR ones range from 595 to 1113 grams. Alright so I ordered a rifle to shoot do some long-range shooting and I will be ordering a scope in a month or so. That’s the difference in FFP and SFP, in a scope so short. The package is a lot more attractive, it’s not that much more money, and it’s not like it has bad glass at all. if not the Razor G3 1-10x is right around NX8 price wise but is much better balanced optically. It is probably better than a PST, but the NX8's I've looked through have left a lot to be desired given the price range. Leupold mV would be my other go to but I couldn’t find as good of a used deal for one. Locked post. Share Sort by: Best. Same price point as NX8 and Mk5. Posted: 4/4/2023 3:22:09 AM EDT I own both the RG2e and the NX8 and noticed no difference either, the razor is much more a joy to look through undeniably but the NX8 with I am between a vx6hd or a Mark 5hd in either the 3-18/ 3. (32X) @ 100 yds. If you're considering the nightforce I really think you gain more than lose by going with the 4-32x50. 6-18x44 Votes: 15 44. They’re both a go-to of mine for hunting and shooting because of the BRIGHT, Decided to upgrade from a Steiner 1-4 (great scope) and have narrowed it down to the Razor 1-10 or VCOG 1-8. Apr 25, 2021 177 47 Maryland. J. Not a bad choice between Much prefer NX8 to Razor gen 1. Sep 8, 2022 #1 Sep 8, 2022 #1 Obviously the S3 is all the buzz. The NX8 sat on my CZ 457 for a while and was used out to 300m/328yds at the range and in the field against gophers and the like. snbyiggidy1 Sergeant of the Hide . Replies 58 I asked Koshkin which would be better on 1x between the Razor G3 and the NX8 and he said that the Razor is just simply better. 4x-20x the glass is damn good. Initial impressions are that the gen 3 and PLX-C are pretty comparable in glass. Let’s compare them fairly following these criteria. 0 and NF NX8 2. Maybe I got lucky. (I can get NF Mil/LE discounts). No big deal on the prs rifle but If I was doing PRS or other quick acquisition activities, I would put the Razor above the NX8. 5-27 and S&B 5-25. If you can afford either, I see no reason to go with the 1-8 Accupower. The DoF, eye box and sight picture are better in both the GII and ZCO. Ive had cheaper sub 1k optics, it's better then them for sure. Every atacr I’ve had so far are to warm for my liking, total opposite of the Combining Nightforce's reputation for robust, bomb-proof scopes with a massive 8x zoom range in a compact, light package, the Nightforce NX8 is the latest and greatest technology for short- to mid-range engagements. The NX8 1-8x24 F1 is a class leading, compact and lightweight riflescope optimized for short to mid-range shooting. 5-20. I am looking at the NX8 4-32x50 with the Mil-C Reticle, the Cronus BTR GEN2 4. 6-18x44 vs NX8 2. I've seen reports that the NX8 is brighter than the ATACR, and brighter than an Aimpoint. But the XTR3 still has fantastic glass, the field of view is amazing, and it has significantly more internal travel. Apr 14, 2022 #185 . I’ve never looked through an Atacr, but my NX8 4-32 thus far seems on par with my Razor G2 4. 260, Boogieman84, MichiganMitten and 3 others. gen2 razor, ect. If my 16” AR were a lighter build I replace the razor with an NX8; but between the pig Stealth barrel, PRS stock, full length rail and suppressor nicer optics is more valuable than a smaller/lighter package. I was Rifle Scopes NX8 vs. ATACR: Comparison of Features. Razor gen 3 is alright. Everyone likes to sit and dissect paper specs and argue all day long but notice superSetCA noted really no difference in his barricade run(s) I own both the RG2e and the NX8 and noticed no difference either, the razor is much more a joy to look through undeniably but the NX8 with the updated reticle is amazing. The other was not. Not to mention, there’s a whole host of folks that don’t know how to mount an optic and are more than willing to blame gear over their own shortcomings. Home / Riflescope / NX8 / NX8 – 4-32x50mm F1. Above 20x it starts to wash quite a bit, but I rarely go above 20 unless I'm zeroing. 5 oz and the Razor 1-10 comes in at 21. Open comment sort options. NX8 2. What is noticeable is differences in reliability, durability, longevity, and correct The upgraded NX8+ and NX7e+ radios incorporate many of the latest exclusive Spektrum innovations such as AS3X+ forward programming and Smart TX file capability. Search $ 0. Illumination, Trijicon illumination is trash for 1x nx8 is definitely daylight bright and a better performer at 1x. For the Razor specifically, even the E model is 4. 5-29x56 aprs6 vs NF NX8 4-32x50 mil-xT . Weight considerations and maybe a preferred reticle would be the ONLY reason I'd pick the RAZOR over the NX8. One NX8 I’ve been behind has been better optically than my LRHS. which of the nx8 and razor has a bigger eye box on Its not just a price difference. Some of them are more “comfortable” to be behind maybe, but actual performance differences are unnoticeable. I’m still torn, but the Razor really does seem to offer the total package for a lightweight FFP hunter Reply Spektrum NX8+ 2. May 1, 2021 #6 May 1, 2021 #6 BuildingConceptsllc said: I'd highly recommend you look at the NX8 4-32. 6-18 MK5 that I've had, You won't beat a Gen 2 Razor glass-wise with an NX8. 5x27x56 mm on my 6. I have both the NX8 and TenMile and both are great scopes. 5-27 and the new Nightforce NX8 4-32. Certainly at 1X im hard pressed to notice any substantial difference. Sub-2500$ USED USED USED. 5” or 12. Reactions: longshot2000. We will share the specifications, pros, and cons of each scope to help you know which scope fits your shooting needs. Mar 19, 2017 HUD, ballistic calcula, optic quality, num of resident load profiles (Revic 3 vs 1 Burris). So think of it like getting a Razor II for $1300. Jul 10, 2013 1,824 1,677. Funny about the love and hate with the NX8 1-8. Home; Popular I owned an NX8, and while I dont own a Razor Gen II E I played around with one and have a Steiner P4Xi which I've heard some people say is basically a 1-4 Razor. I want to try and stay production legal so my buddies and I can directly compete at locals. 5 Creedmoor. Posted: 9/7/2021 9:31:37 PM EDT [#19] Quote History. Mark 5 vs NX8 . My main reasons for considering the Nx8 is its FFP so for in-between magnification shots hold overs are accurate at say 5-6x power. The compact profile of the NX8 (only 8. Still debating. The only advantage the NX8 has is the length and ridiculous illumination. Next Last. Building a 33XC bolt action this year. Cronos BTR, help me choose! Thread starter Ryan7839; Start date Nov 25, 2019; R. 5-20x50 F1. WEIGHT: 28. The V6 is better than my V4 and I don't think you could go wrong with it. 9% Mark5HD 3. Reactions: Graywolf. 12 Items Found. 5 Still debating. I’m not saying the Credo is bad but compared to the Razor, it’s a lesser scope. With the Razor on 4x, it is a noticeable difference compared to the Credo, as in better. Is the NF worth the extra? It seems quite a few people are unimpressed with the nightforce and the Cronus seems to have a huge following. FINISH: Black MSRP: $2,100 MANUFACTURER: Nightforce; I have a long gun with an NX8 - it's a great scope and I would highly recommend it. Posted: 5/31/2020 8:43:40 AM EDT [#6] Quote History. If you need FFP you can pickup NX8s for equal or less which again makes this a tough sell to me. Cronus is a solid Razor II competitor. Weight between the 2 is a toss up. Vortex Razor HD AMG 6-24x50. [ARCHIVED THREAD] - Vortex Razor Gen II HD-E vs Nightforce NX8 vs Nightforce ATACR. Not as good as the Razor 1-6x or the ATACR 1-8x, but no issues. NX8 Pros: FFP w/ scale reticle Very bright dot Small form factor Built-in throw lever Razor Pros: SFP (by definition, a larger and more generous optical system) w/ BDC reticle Very bright dot A few hundred dollars less I plan on getting an NX8, when they're available. because of that i wound up getting the Razor G3 and am SUPER glad i did because at 1x this thing truly is a bulky red dot with the way the FFP reticle works and i think you would be I don't have enough time behind my buddy's MK V to directly compare, but as far as my collection goes, I'd take my ZCO 420 (obviously) and Razor gen II over my NX8 for just about everything aside from affordability or weight. Mar 15, 2018 347 329 Sweet Home, Oregon. Quoted: That In this Nightforce NX8 vs ATACR comparison, we review the Nightforce NX8 1-8x24mm F1 Riflescope and the Nightforce Optics NX8 1-8×24 Scope. Eotech with a good magnifier is great too and is debatably the best for speed and decent PID. Consider that problem solved by the NightForce NX8. When you first look through a Razor at 1x, you think, “Wow. The VTAC drill also didn’t look that strenuous or fast. I saw where another poster posted the same thoughts, but he believed the resolution was a little better on the AMG, but not that I could see. Discuss this article Printer-friendly version All articles by this author. aslrookie Private. 2 mil vs the . The GII Razor does well there. r/longrange Gen 3 Razor 1-10 vs PLX-C 1-8 Share Add a Comment. A used 4-16x42 ATACR can regularly be found for $1800(ish) in the US, and competes more directly with a Mk5 and Gen 2 Razor. I am going to pick up the NX8 soon and have less than a thousand rounds on one so take everything with a grain of salt. Planning to put on a 14. timmay; Jul 17, 2022; 2. Considering the cost difference I think it's great choice. The NX8 is very popular. If you did a drill like El Prez where you have to switch between multiple targets at speed, you would immediately notice the difference that heavy fisheye makes between the NX8 and something like a Kahles/Razor or even the PLX-C. For most people this stuff is for recreational use. The razor is also being used by the us military if that’s why you consider the ta31 a standard. Not crazy, but it’s NOT like the Razor or the Kahles. Ive had the Nx8 2. When I had my gun built I went with the NX8 in FFP - after shooting, I quickly decided that was the wrong choice for me - at low power the reticle is very thin and difficult to see. I put this Nightforce NX8 scope through a lot in the brief time that I had it. I have a vortex GEN II 4. Nov Looking for some feedback from anyone that has run a NX8 1-8 on a SCAR17. The NX8 I have is the 2. 5-20X50mm Rifle Scope offers a wide magnification range and useful features that will help you adapt to any situation on the hunting grounds or in the field. Share Add a Comment. Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. 4GHz DSMX® 20-Channel Transmitter Overview. I used both in an advanced carbine class the summer of 2020. Just released their LHT 4. Also, Burris has MOA mode that indicates The NX8 series is a fairly recent addition to the Nightforce line, being shown at the 2019 SHOT Show in Las Vegas, with an official release in July of the same year. I have found the NX8 to be very good. I’ve owned a razor gen II As with NX8, the large outer lines are visible on 8x. 5-25x42 if I can find a good deal on one. So close I personally cant tell the difference. The word on the street is that older NX8’s had poorer optics, and that NF must’ve did a stealth upgrade at some point. Nothing is faster than the eotech reticle in any red reflex sight and it's still king in circles where millisecond mean life or death. Reply reply [deleted] • I’ve heard a lot of 7-35 owners state it’s the only good optic in the ATACR line, which I infer means they really like it. I need help, and I read the FAQ Archived post. Vortex Razor Gen III 6x36x56mm or Nightforce ATACR 7x35x56mm? $2900 vs $3600. The Razor HD Gen II-E sheds nearly a 1/4 pound from its predecessor, A low-profile locking illumination dial has 11 levels of brightness with off positions between each setting. Views: 9204. Tikka T3x 6. ★ As noted, the LHT’s objective was equivalently as dusty as the Razor G2’s, but I neglected to snap a pic. I would really like to try out an nx8 for myself. Imo, there's a big difference between NX8 and SHV. #3 S&B 5-25 The Razor Gen3 1-10x is basically the best of both worlds from the K16i and NX8, and it’s a vastly superior scope in nearly every respect compared to the NX8. Out of the box, the NX8+ is compatible with Smart Technology. 7 and thought the nx8 would be great for that, but I was worried about the eye box. 5-20 when compared to a MK5 I had side by side. With the NX8 vs Gen III you are basically trading performance at 1x for less size and weight. Overseas, they’re designed to tempt shavers away from still-mainstream safety razors and into inexpensive cartridge systems (between 10¢ and 50¢ per cartridge). I have a long gun with an NX8 - it's a great scope and I would highly recommend it. However, I like the 1x on the Razor a lot. com. I like the XTRIII better than NX8 optically but struggle with reticle. I have the option to get the athlon for 1300 and the NF for 1720. the NX8 sacrifices a lot in performance to fit itself in that small of a form factor and weigh as little as it does. Center point of current FC-DMX reticle is more fine than would be ideal for use at 1x without illumination. As silly as it might sound, I've literally been losing sleep over this - and I now feel good about the choice The Razor has a little better color control, but the XTR3 is brighter. I bought a VX5hd last year that evidently does not track properly and does not return to zero. MAGNIFICATION: 4X to 32X OBJECTIVE LENS DIAMETER: 50mm TUBE DIAMETER: 30mm EYE RELIEF: 3. I let some really green shooters behind my rifle once after they were having trouble spotting hits on paper at 300m with their Diamondback Tactical 6-24x. The eye box on the NX8 is so finicky at max magnification that its really not worth it. 5”. New. I am not Forums. I see I can Skip to main content. once past about 300M it is a night and and day difference between the NX8 and the ATACR and I do not have to fiddle with the diopter at all. I prefer FFP and ability to adjust parallax. If you’re looking at a new NX8, the Vortex is a similar price and a lot more scope. Been happy with it. My concern is the Vortex is about a pound heavier. Channels Airplanes Electric Flight. I have an NX8 4-32, and an XTR3 3-18. but those two nf were tanks with excellent glass and dials. I checked around and picked up an NX8 4-32x50mm F2 MOAR CF2D for a NX8 4-32X 50mm F2 Specs. The mark V and company are a little heavier and built more like the tactical minded scopes built by nightforce. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. 5-27 EBR-7C and for a wild card Minox ZP5 5-25 MR4 Criteria: FFP/mil/mil >22x Illuminated tree reticle with . I’m also considering the March compact 2. My favorite reticle. Yeah. Not they dont perform well on 1x, they absolutely do. the NX8 or AMG. 75" long and 17 ounces) allows Nightforce to implement their signature superior optics in a small package that doesn't add a large signature or weight Nightforce nx8 or vortex razor 1-6 . I'd take the latter two over the NX8 for ringing steel (especially in match type situations). This will be going on a 11. The difference is striking in person, though I don't notice a difference when shooting. Jadejade13; Aug 26, 2024; Observation & Sighting Devices 2. 5-27. Once again, there is no parallax adjustment on this scope. View Quote. Jul 30, 2022. Having a lighter weight while offering high-quality glass is really the best of both I bought an NX8 and Razor3 when both were relatively new to the market. The gist is they have killed pretty much all the popular lpvos (several razors, trijicon, leupold etc). 5-27 Gen II Razor lined up for XTR3 comparisons this weekend. 4 - 5-30X56 with the CFR reticle. I will be getting a razor 1-6 soon like others have said I don't think it can be beat by anything else. Shortdot, Vudu, Razor, kahles, ATACR, NX8 and SR8 (even through its a boob) are the only ones I have seen that are daylight bright. 5 ounces with clear glass. The NX8 sits below the higher priced Nightforce ATACR series and above the NXS series. Quoted: The pictures at the link are of the specific optic. Burris did nothing spectacular in the is aspect. Street price of the Looking at either the Vortex Razor HD LHT 4. You read NX8 failures just like MK5, just like ATACR, just like Razor, just like S&B, blah blah blah. Image quality suffers at higher mag and it has some fisheye at 1x but all in all can’t beat a 1-10. I need help, but I'd take the Razor because I don't like how the entire ocular bell moves when you adjust the magnification on the ATACR. I find no issues with the eyebox I've used the NX8 and the Razor. The only 2 to hold up and never loose zero, including an atacr with over 100k rounds, are both nf's. Specifically eye box, value of a 34mm tube vs 30mm. He actually recommended the nx8 over everything, stating shot timers showed no tangible difference shooting drills in kit and such. Yes, you are right about the K16i. 2 mil wind Zero stop Capped or locking windage would be nice Tough/durable This is strictly for personal, hobby type use on our local 1,000 yard range. That was me. Not to make your choice harder haha Reply reply [deleted] • Not sure what the boner is for acogs. But I would be fine with any of them, NX8 first, then either the Razor or VCOG (Razor has better illumination, the VCOG 1-8x has more 2x and The Razor Gen3 1-10x is a vastly superior optic in pretty much every respect, as it has much better glass and optical characteristics like the larger eyebox, or better light transmission. But its just not a strong CONCLUSION: Nightforce NX8 Scope Review. 5 vs Mark 5HD. Like: Mil-XT. The Nightforce NXS series of scopes are all in the second focal plane where as the NX8 It’s twice the price but is it twice the optic. Owned a razor, currently own Atacr, have used just about all of the rest. Way better than my razor especially at max power and fading light. 5-27x56, and within each of those there are a multiple reticle choices. After a few thousand rounds over the past two I don't personally read the eye relief stats much, but go from experience, and this might be where people point their eyes differently, or something like that. I have a 5-25 MK5 HD and a 4. TheNoviceVet • Grabbed some quick photos of the Gen 3 1-10 and the PLX-Compact. The Kahles is lighter than the NX8, capped turrets like the Razor, a class-leading FOV that blows both away and it brighter than both. New posts Search forums. Click to expand It doesn’t get much brighter than that in Mississippi. I own 2 8x atacr, nxs 2. I like them both, for some reason I am drawn to the NXS. Community Statistics . I‘ve run a Vortex Razor 1-10, Trijicon V-COG, and currently own a Razor 1-6. 5 in. It’s pretty sweet IMO. Both these scopes are more premium than anything I have owned before. Long range is relative to the shooter and the gun, and out to 1,000 yards optics like the Razor HD Gen 2 first focal plane riflescopes will get you there no questions. 5-22x50 Votes: 19 55. Be the first to comment Nobody's responded to this post yet. 5 PRC. Like 10,000x the battery life, actually daylight bright, I think the reticle on the ATACR is actual dog shit, and I found the glass Size and weight it’s a direct competitor to the nightforce NX8 less than 10” and less than 17oz. I have both the NXS 5. 1x, 8x doesnt matter it is better. Aug 23, 2008 1,948 1,800 MO mkmachining. I think the glass is ever so slightly better on the NX8, and I personally like the turret feel more too. I’ve been going back and forth between the Razor gen 2 4. Reactions: macmo and Snaz. Have the old reticle. The Razor is more clear to the edges when compared to the Credo, the Razor seems brighter, the red dot is very bright on the Razor and the glass is more clear overal. 5cm. At the end of the day, they are both solid scopes and will serve you well. 5-29x56 with the APRS6, the EOTech Vudu 5-25X50 with the MD3-MRAD reticle, and finally the Maven RS. Reactions: Deleted member 128515. 5 oz heavier that where it should be (17 oz for the K16i or NX8) and the magnification adjustment is ridiculously stiff. Admittedly, my Vortex Razor scopes have been good as well but my experience with the Vortex Gen II PSTs and now the LHT loosing zero has soured the brand a bit. I currently have a vxr patrol and may be upgrading soon. Ryan7839 Private. Including a turret failure with my AMG, I have seen at least four other failures of the AMG and Gen 2 scopes. Segmented circles of legacy reticles also share the issue of blocking some of the target. The 1-8 accupower has good glass too, the NX8 is a hair better. Cuz they saw it on YT and it’s an easy thing to measure vs very difficult things to measure like true optical clarity and true eyeboxes, etc Agree with you tho that spec masturbation vs actually shooting in a focused improvement way gives you a completely different perspective. of The razor glass is on the same level. Weighing in at 10 to 20 ounces less than Vortex’s Razor HD line of variable powers, this model would be a “mid-weight. ELEVATION RANGE: 90 MOA WINDAGE RANGE: 70 MOA LENGTH: 13. I like the glass, eye box and reticle better on the Trijicon. 5-22, S&B 5-25) carbonbased; Sep 17, 2024; Observation & Sighting Devices Replies 10 Views 409. I just wish the illumination is little bit brighter, like NX8, Atacr or Gen 3 Razor bright . Oct 5, 2018 The smaller size and weight the NX8 offers is really nice, although its 11 ish ounces the NX8 feels very compact and light still with a large mag range. Im coming from a 3-15x42 Razor HD LHT. Thread starter BassFlats&Beyond; Start date Nov 23, 2018; Vortex razor 1-6 or Trijicon AccuPower 1-8 In my experience with the NX8 I found it to have the glass clarity and brightness that you would expect from a Nightforce but it definitely had a less generous eye box than a Razor or K16i/Z8i Razor. Amazon has an enormous selection of first- and second-hand riflescopes at a variety of prices. carbonbased. Nov 25, 2019 #1 Nov 25, 2019 #1 So, I’m putting together a new gun for next year. Its just a tough simple scope that works. If primary arms is The Nightforce NX8 lineup covers every rifleman’s needs with the 1-8 for your AR platform rifle, rimfires, and magnum caliber rifles for dangerous game with its wide, bright field of view. 5x vs 3. Vid’s on IG it has great eyebox and good eye relief. Commercial Supporter. They both dial and RTZ very reliably. heres a video of the nx8 vs the kahles, not the same thing but gives you an idea Nightforce NX8 vs Kahles K16i Eyebox. Share. 5-22) are said to be very similar. eye box on most magnifiers is tighter than the nx8 so if magnified I don't personally read the eye relief stats much, but go from experience, and this might be where people point their eyes differently, or something like that. I would jump on that. Nightforce nx8 or vortex razor 1-6 . As stated I would do a razor 1-6x before an nx8, and i am a big nightforce guy. I really did not like that razor. 5-22 and the March 3-24, especially considering the price difference are interesting. This will be mainly used on a PRS gun, but could be switched over to a hunting rifle in the fall. I dont get a chance to use it bunch except for at 50 yards but i enjoy it. I think the mark V glass is on par with my nx8. Personal comments: The ATACR seems to balance its performance between the high and low Nightforce vs Vortex Round 2: Long Range Precision Shooting. It comes ready to support your Spektrum™ Smart batteries and Smart Avian™ The NX8 has been around since 2017, but this version features a number of significant upgrades. 6-18x44 at the low ends and gain quite a bit of magnification on the top Flare / Glare / Backlit notes on 4 scopes (NX8 4-32, Razor Gen II 4. Never messed with the Trijicon. 5-10, and an atacr 4-16x . 5-22 RAZOR but I'm sure its a very nice scope as well, and the mechanics between the two (3-15/4. The NF appears to be a tube you look through. 3x) and more magnification at the top end (20x vs. Add your thoughts and get the conversation going. The ability to see very fine detail looks very close to me. I had the 2. Old. Home; Popular I am going to pick up the NX8 soon and have less than a thousand rounds on one so take everything with a grain of salt. FREE SHIPPING ON ALL ONLINE ORDERS OVER $80! Search. The extra magnification helps when shooting little rimfire targets and the range of a . It’s worth mentioning that the NX8 and ATACR scopes have good optical quality. 4oz). I have looked through the 3's and I cannot find a big enough difference between them and the 2's to justify the huge increase in price. https: Check out the difference in brightness between the PST II (left) and Razor (right) on max setting with fresh batteries: Attached File. Nightforce NX8 4-32x50 F1 (reticle: Mil-XT or Tremor) Leupold Mark 5HD 5-25x56 MIL (reticle: Illuminated Front Focal Tremor) Vortex RAZOR HD AMG 6-24X50 FFP (reticle: EBR-7b MRAD) Background * The rifle. Thread starter Tyler Kemp; Start date Sep 8, 2022; 1; 2; 3; Next. The Razor has no advantage except for maybe durability, but that would have to be proven. The NX8 and ATACR scopes sound terrific – making it harder to decide. The NX8 is newer and has less Weight and length are a main concern on such a small rifle, hence the consideration of the NX8, but I'm a big concerned with the eye box that people are saying. 308 NX8 vs Razor III for AR10 - Page 4 Help Athlon Cronus btr Gen II 4. DMR/Battle rifle with the ability to engage steel out to 600-700 yards is the primary goal. $16-1700 street price for EBR-7C. Gun will be primarily for close range with extended capability, out to 600 yards or so. Those eye boxes are bigger, and the scope edges tend to “disappear “. The weight makes sense considering the specifications and durability. For me glass/reticle is first so it slightly edges out the G2. 2ft on FOV comparing the nx8 4-32x50 to the leupold 3. To thick. 18x) but if you read my review of the NX8 2. I've honestly never missed having that extra magnification that comes with my NX8 or Razor Gen II, and that's including glassing some deer around 350m in the sticks. 5-22x56 on a Bergara Premier 6mm CM and the NX8 4-32x50 SFP on a Christensen BA Tactical in 6. 5-22x50 instead. Thread starter HMRamateur; Start date May 27, 2023; Razor LHT 4. They’re both great scopes and I’m sure if someone is shopping between the two you will be pleased with your choice. Nov 26, 2020 57 24 Middle Earth. Top. Q&A. plus Vortex Warranty is unmatched. Rated 5. Posted: 4/2/2018 6:39:43 PM EDT [#28] For light weight value, the NX8 and for overall value the razor 2. Question is, the $1k difference from the cheapest one worth it? I will be shooting maybe up to 200-300 yards max Looks like it's a sure thing the new PA is going to be much much better at 1x vs the NX8, and will have a better reticle at 8x so it should be a winner for me. 5-22x50 or the NX8 4-32x50. These scopes are about as heavy as I would really like to go. - NightForce NX8 4-32x50 F1 ($2150) - Vortex Razor HD AMG 6-24x50 ($2500) Current 56mm considerations: - Vortex Razor HD Gen2 4. Have an NX8 4-32 MIL-C, no experience with the ATACR. Finally, I’m not a NF fanboy. Razor LHT vs. EOTech Vudu Vs Vortex Razor [ Comparison Guide] In this Nightforce NX8 vs ATACR comparison, we review the Nightforce NX8 1-8x24mm F1 Riflescope and the Nightforce Optics NX8 1-8×24 Scope. As stated I had a NX8 and really liked it. Tough call. 5-20x50 (FFP) ATACR 4-16x42 (FFP) I have never fondled the NX8 or ATACR. New comments cannot be posted. That's what I was worried about. 5-20 you’ll find that using 8x in their optical design came with drawbacks, specifically with distortion, edge sharpness, DOF/Parallax. 5-22x50. JayseM_SportOptics Commercial Supporter. and Burris is lighter, 30 mil tube and 50 mil objective. Kahles K18i is also an excellent scope with just amazing glass. I let some really green shooters behind my rifle I currently have a Razor Gen 2 3-18x50 on my 6. I think a 2-10 or 3-whatever is a better setup if you need 10x. Same for the AMG. I've compared mine side by side several times. Quoted: I'm looking at a 3-9 accupoint for my deer rifle, and a 4-16 accupower for a longish range rifle. 5-20 FFP and I love it for where I use the rifle, but in the woods there are better options. But 5oz is a big difference. Otherwise, I’d take a gen 2 razor or Mark 5 over an NXS or NX8. both have their advantages. However, it sold a few minutes ago. Sig won an Army contract for LPVO in 2nd focal plane, Nighforce won for FFP. Battle rifle? I find myself going to the nx8 more often for the lightweight nature of it. I sold the NX8 because the eyebox wasn't great on 1x and was almost useless unless the rifle was completely stabilized on 8x, if i was in any awkward position the 8x seemed useless NightForce NX8 riflescopes build upon a hard-earned reputation with new technology and a remarkable 8x zoom range, razor-sharp at every setting, a challenge that has vexed optical designers for years. Is it mind blowingly better? Comparing the two new Zeiss LRP S3 scopes to a Nightforce ATACR 5-25x56mm and a Vortex Razor HD Gen III in 6-36x56mm was a case of “David versus Goliath. I just wish the illumination is little bit brighter, like NX8, Atacr or Gen 3 Razor bright K16i illum will appear much brighter on the dot-based reticles (3gr, G4b, Sm2) than Looks like it's a sure thing the new PA is going to be much much better at 1x vs the NX8, it felt better than my old nx8, accupower 1-8, or razor gen 3 imo. Search Trijicon AccuPower vs Vortex Razor. I’d be all for the NX8, but I keep hearing many complaints regarding eyebox etc. I’d consider the SWFA SS if their 3-15 was HD (I have their 5-25x50 HD SS). Great FFP combat reticle. Oct 24, 2018 393 194. The Kahles is allegedly better in both regards but it’s reportedly not a very We compare the Primary Arms PLX Compact and the Nightforce N8X going head to head in the following criteria:1) Weight2) Construction3) FOV4) Reticle5) Clarit I have the razor 1-10, nx8 1-8, Primary arms raptor 1-6, burris xtr II 1-8, and a eotech vudu 1-8, riton tactix 1-8, and a cheapo firefield 1-6. I live in the south East and the reticle is plenty bright for me but honestly don’t really use the Illumination. From the 4-16 ATACRs, 4. NX8 vs Maven RS. Unless you are LE or Mil- yeah you do get to choose the conditions you shoot in. 5-27 G2Rs, and 3. TikkaDoberman Private. ARCHIVED; Posted: 12/22/2018 7:13:12 PM EDT I have a dilemma, and need help from people that had actual experience with the optics mentioned above. 5 low end, #2 (tie) dusty Razor LHT 4. Jan 31, 2020 #2 Jan 31, 2020 #2 Find somebody with an nx8 and then form an opinion your own. 5-20x50 F1 gives you one riflescope that will rule virtually any shooting environment, anywhere on Earth, at almost any distance. Mar Sample size of 1 vs 1, but the comments between the comparison of the Razor 4. . 6 ounces it is 6. NIGHTFORCE NX8-1-8x24mm F1 Capped First Focal Plane (F1/FFP) Looking for the absolute best LPVO (low powered variable optic) scope that money can buy in 2020? Well then check out this matchup between these 4 scopes!K All this back and forth about the NX8 vs NXS, FFP vs SFP got me thinking. Both turn off between illumination settings. What's new. I'm also curious about dot brightness as this is important. The Leupold The NX8 series comes in a total of three variants including 1-8x, 2. Friday at 2:22 PM. 56 gun out to its max abilities, the NX8 is a SOLID scope, and super hard to beat. 5-20x and 4-32x. 1% Total voters 34; HMRamateur Will work for powder. Had an opportunity to compare a MK5 3-18, RXR LHT 3-15 and an NX8 2-20. It just didn't move well at $1000. It comes ready to support your Spektrum™ Smart batteries and Smart Avian™ ESCs so you can receive essential telemetry data at your fingertips in real time. Details below and a direct link HERE. Minuteman. The steep price of the ATACR is also concerning but seems to address the eye box and reticle issues of the NX8 but with additional bulk and The NX8 1-8x24 F1 is a class leading, compact and lightweight riflescope optimized for short to mid-range shooting. unlike the leupold youre not gaining much weight between the lower power model and higher power (roughly . However, as noted above, comparing a Razor to an NX8 is apples and oranges, as the Razor is meant to perform at a much higher level than the NX8. The weight and profile far outweigh any perceived The NX8+ also incorporates many of the latest exclusive Spektrum™ innovations for a level of ease, efficiency, and performance that discriminating pilots demand. But as soon as I was ready to pull the trigger the price went up from 1600 to about 2000.
tumw
tgjk
vmju
ovecl
nvmyqf
hojelz
erc
ukxnde
muqbl
agnt